April 21, 2026 in Business

Pavan’s Fall – Lessons for Property Managers

Where is the lift?

Most serious liability incidents begin with something people assumed was working.

Lifts, fire doors, and other safety systems are used every day without incident, which can create a false sense of security.

Events like this serve as a reminder to periodically verify that critical systems are functioning, not just on a maintenance report.

A lift accident in Stellenbosch is a reminder of a risk many buildings quietly carry.

When The unexpected Happens

Most people involved in property or hospitality management will read about Andrea Pavan’s recent accident in Stellenbosch with a moment of genuine shock, followed quickly by a reassuring thought: that sort of thing could never happen here.

It is an understandable reaction. Most buildings are safe. Modern lifts incorporate multiple mechanical safeguards designed specifically to prevent incidents like this. In normal circumstances, a lift door should not be able to open unless the car is present.

Yet, incidents like this serve as a reminder that risk does not disappear simply because it is unlikely. In many cases, the confidence that something cannot happen is based largely on the fact that it has not happened yet.

Pavan, an Italian professional golfer in South Africa for the South African Open, reportedly opened a lift door at his accommodation and fell approximately three storeys when the lift car was not present. He sustained serious back and shoulder injuries, including vertebral fractures, and required surgery. By his own account, the fact that he is able to walk feels like a miracle.

It’s important to underline that we do not know what the specific reasons were for this particular incident. What we can extract from the event are  the broader questions for anyone responsible for buildings used by staff, residents, guests, or members of the public: When last were the safety-critical systems in your building independently tested and verified as working in reality, not simply recorded as serviced, on paper?

There is a category of risk that tends to become invisible precisely because the equipment involved works reliably most of the time. Lifts, fire doors, balcony railings, electrical installations and similar systems are used every day without incident. Over time, familiarity breeds a quiet assumption that everything must be functioning as intended.

Maintenance visits are scheduled. Contractors sign off on service reports. Documentation is filed.

But the gap between a maintenance record that appears correct and a system that is actually functioning safely can sometimes be wider than building owners or operators realise.

Practical Steps Worth Considering

In light of incidents like this, a few practical steps are worth considering:

Review the most recent lift maintenance report.

Not simply to file it, but to understand what it says. Were any defects, warnings, or recommendations noted? If so,

Practical steps worth considering

In light of incidents like this, a few practical steps are worth considering:

Review the most recent lift maintenance report.

Not simply to file it, but to understand what it says. Were any defects, warnings, or recommendations noted? If so, were they actually resolved?

Have a candid conversation with the maintenance contractor.

Beyond “is everything fine?” ask questions such as: What are the oldest components in this system? What would you replace if budget were not a constraint? What issues are you currently monitoring?

Review liability cover.

Many businesses purchased liability insurance years ago and have not revisited it since. Buildings are upgraded, occupancy changes, and foot traffic increases. The policy limits and wording that were appropriate at the time may not reflect the current exposure. Such reviews should be discussed in detail with a licensed insurance broker and should be expanded to include sight of any external contractor’s liability policies.

Improve documentation going forward.

Not because something is expected to go wrong, but because documentation often determines how effectively an incident can be managed. Organisations that navigate these situations best are typically those able to demonstrate a consistent and genuine commitment to maintenance and safety.

Regular Reflection and Action

None of these steps are complex. In many cases, they simply require a moment of honest reflection about whether the systems under one’s responsibility are receiving the attention they require, or whether there has been an assumption that someone else is taking care of them.

Pavan has said that being able to walk feels like a miracle. One hopes his recovery is swift and complete.

Incidents like this are rare — until they aren’t.

And when they do happen, the difference between a near miss and a catastrophe is often not the design of the system, but whether someone chose to verify it before it was tested in real life.

This article was originally published in FA News April 2026 Edition – read more here https://www.fanews.co.za/publication/pdf_338_fanewsapr2026#page=46

About the Author

Simon Colman is the CEO of The Liability Company.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By browsing this website, you agree to our privacy policy.
I Agree